The detailed reading and the sense-making process, in particular, takes a long time. Are the background literature and study rationale clearly articulated?
Check with your summary and describe how well the topic is covered in the article. Summary of the article. The responses have been edited for clarity and brevity.
If you are interested in becoming a member or if you would just like to contribute something of interest, please read the membership and submission guidelinesand then send us off a note via our Contact Us form.
Knowing that I work better when I focus on one project at a time, I spent the next two months carrying out all of my regular lab work while only pondering the review article and skimming the literature when I had time.
My tone is one of trying to be constructive and helpful even though, of course, the authors might not agree with that characterization. What is the place of the article in its field of knowledge? I think a lot of reviewers approach a paper with the philosophy that they are there to identify flaws.
Each person has a definite personality. Is the statistical analysis sound and justified? However, I often ended up with a strong scaffolding onto which I could later add some of those dense, fact-laden sentences.
Finally, I evaluate whether the methodology used is appropriate. Hopefully, this will be used to make the manuscript better rather than to shame anyone. One great thing about the book is the way Korman developed the characters.
If I've never heard of the authors, and particularly if they're from a less developed nation, then I'm also more likely to accept the invitation. I consider four factors: What theories does the author dwell upon? Demonstrate how the evidence supports the argument in the article.
Plotnick, the boys' landlord and owner of the Olympiad Delicatessen, is one of the greediest and most annoying people you'll ever meet in a book, and the boys spend a lot of their time trying to find ways to get even with him. It is also very important that the authors guide you through the whole article and explain every table, every figure, and every scheme.
But I only mention flaws if they matter, and I will make sure the review is constructive. How to do it It is now time to start putting your essay together. Also, I take the point of view that if the author cannot convincingly explain her study and findings to an informed reader, then the paper has not met the burden for acceptance in the journal.
Before you begin Step One: To what extent does the Discussion place the findings in a wider context and achieve a balance between interpretation and useful speculation versus tedious waffling?
Even if you are focused on writing quality reviews and being fair and collegial, it's inevitable that some colleagues will be less than appreciative about the content of the reviews. Finally, there are occasions where you get extremely exciting papers that you might be tempted to share with your colleagues, but you have to resist the urge and maintain strict confidentiality.
If there are any aspects of the manuscript that I am not familiar with, I try to read up on those topics or consult other colleagues. The decision is made by the editor, and my job as a reviewer is to provide a nuanced and detailed report on the paper to support the editor.
What do you consider when deciding whether to accept an invitation to review a paper? Are the background literature and study rationale clearly articulated? Also, I take the point of view that if the author cannot convincingly explain her study and findings to an informed reader, then the paper has not met the burden for acceptance in the journal.
Is the supportive evidence relevant? I make a decision after drafting my review. I try to stick to the facts, so my writing tone tends toward neutral. I then delve into the Methods and Results sections.
Answering these questions should facilitate your outline writing:I start by making a bullet point list of the main strengths and weaknesses of the paper and then flesh out the review with details. I often refer back to my annotated version of the online paper.
How to Write an Article Review. Sep 07, Types of Academic Writing. An article review is a type of professional paper writing. It demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. When you know the answers to these questions, you may start writing your literature review.
Below are examples. What this handout is about This handout will help you write a book review, a report or essay that offers a critical perspective on a text.
It offers a process and suggests some strategies for writing book reviews. What is Continued. How to Write a Review An easy to understand Online Writing Guide for beginning writers. Here you will find a list of various writing models, general tips and hints to help guide you to writing success.
When I undertook the task of writing a scientific literature review article last year, I had hoped that a Google search would reveal a handful of how-to pages thoughtfully created by veterans of this particular writing process.
Part 1. Drafting Your Review. 1. Start with a compelling fact or opinion on the movie. Start your review by writing the names of the actors, director and producer.
Thanks! Yes No. Not Helpful 35 Helpful %().Download